<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Preventive Medicine (Int J Prev Med)</JournalTitle><Issn>2008-7802</Issn><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>14</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">Comparison of Microleakage of Two Materials Used as Fissure Sealants with  Different Methods: An In vitro Study</title><FirstPage>171</FirstPage><LastPage>5</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author/><Author/><Author/><Author/></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>14</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt;Marginal seal has a principal role in durability and &lt;br /&gt;clinical success offissure sealants. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of two materials used as pit and fissure sealant with different methods of application.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;The 55 extracted premolars were assigned randomly to &lt;br /&gt;one ofthe following five groups: Group 1: Acid-etching (ultra-etch) + fissure sealant (conventional method), Group 2: Acid etching + bonding agent (single bond) + fissure sealant, Group 3: Self-etching primer + bonding agent (SE bond) + fissure sealant, Group 4: Acid-etching + bonding agent + flowable composite (Filtek flow), Grope 5: Self-etching primer + bonding agent + flowable composite. Following sealant placement, the teeth were thermocycled (3000 cycles; 5-55&amp;deg;C) and then immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution for 24 h and then immersed in photo developing solution for 4 h under fluorescent light. The teeth were then sectioned in a bucco-lingual direction. Microleakage was scored using a stereomicroscope and a 4-criteria ranking/ordinal scale. Data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt;The result of tests showed that there were statistical &lt;br /&gt;differences between some groups. Groups 2 and 4 had the lowest and Groups 3 and 5 had the highest microleakage scores and a statistically significant difference could be displayed between them (P&amp;lt; 0.05). Mean microleakage in Group 4 was also significantly lower than in Group 1 (P&amp;lt; 0.05).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt;Using acid and a bonding agent prior to sealant &lt;br /&gt;placement seems to be the best technique for sealing pits and fissures.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt;Bonding agent, fissure sealant, flowable composite, &lt;br /&gt;microleakage</abstract><web_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/view/1295</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/download/1295/1356</pdf_url></Article></Articles>
