<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Preventive Medicine (Int J Prev Med)</JournalTitle><Issn>2008-7802</Issn><Volume>1</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2017</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>05</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">Assessing the Need for Routine Screening for Mycoplasma genitalium in the Low‑risk Female Population: A Prevalence and Co‑infection Study on Women from Croatia</title><FirstPage>1807</FirstPage><LastPage>1807</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Clinical Microbiology Department, Teaching&#13;
Institute of Public Health “Dr. Andrija Štampar”, &amp; Medical Microbiology Department, School of Medicine,&#13;
University of Zagreb, Zagreb</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Unit,&#13;
Polyclinic Dr. Zora Profozić", Zagreb</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Epidemiology Department, Teaching Institute&#13;
of Public Health “Dr. Andrija Štampar”, Zagreb &amp; &#13;
Social Medicine and Epidemiology Department,&#13;
Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Clinical Microbiology Department, Teaching&#13;
Institute of Public Health “Dr. Andrija Štampar”, Zagreb</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Clinical Microbiology Department, Teaching&#13;
Institute of Public Health “Dr. Andrija Štampar”, Zagreb</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Clinical Microbiology Department, Teaching&#13;
Institute of Public Health “Dr. Andrija Štampar”, &amp; Medical Microbiology Department, School of Medicine,&#13;
University of Zagreb, Zagreb</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>05</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;There is an ongoing debate regarding possible cost and benefts, but also harm of universal screening for the emerging sexually transmitted pathogen &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Mycoplasma genitalium&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Methods: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;From the initial pool of 8665 samples that were tested, a subset of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Chlamydia trachomatis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;‑positive and randomly selected &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;C. trachomatis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;‑negative cervical swabs were further interrogated for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;M. genitalium &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;by real‑time polymerase chain reaction, using a 224 bp long fragment of the glyceraldehyde‑3‑phosphate dehydrogenase gene. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Results: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;M. genitalium &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;was detected in 4.8% of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;C. trachomatis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;‑positive samples and none of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;C. trachomatis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;‑negative samples. Accordingly,&lt;br /&gt;a signifcant association was shown between &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;M. genitalium &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;C. trachomatis &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;P &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;&amp;lt; 0.01), but also between &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;M. genitalium &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Mycoplasma hominis &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;infection (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;P &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;&amp;lt; 0.01). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;Based on the results, routine screening is recommended only for women with one or more identifed risk factors. Moreover, younger age does not represent an appropriate inclusion/exclusion criterion for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;M. genitalium &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;testing in the low‑risk female population.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0" style="color: #00652e;"&gt;Keywords: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Cervical swabs, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis, screening, sexually transmitted infections&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/view/1807</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/download/1807/2096</pdf_url></Article></Articles>
