<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Preventive Medicine (Int J Prev Med)</JournalTitle><Issn>2008-7802</Issn><Volume>10</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2019</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>18</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">Development and Validation of “Caregiver Burden Scale‑Indian Population"</title><FirstPage>2008</FirstPage><LastPage>7802</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Occupational Therapy, Swami Vivekananda National Institute of Rehabilitation Training and Research, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Occupational Therapy, Swami Vivekananda National Institute of Rehabilitation Training and Research, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Psychology, Center of Advanced Study in Psychology, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>18</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;Caregiver burden is always a neglected domain, and assessment of burden with available instruments developed in one country is neither reliable nor valid because of different cultural, ethical, religious, and other personal values. This study is an attempt to develop an&lt;br /&gt;appropriate instrument which can assess the burden on caregivers from the Indian subcontinent and other Asian countries. This work is an attempt to develop and standardization of CBS-IP using content and construct validity. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;The study was conducted with a total of 125 (55 – initial&lt;br /&gt;interview + 25 – pilot study + 45 – construct validity) caregivers of individual with chronic neurologically ill patients. Content and construct validation was performed as follows: (1) search of relevant electronic databanks and use of experts and caregivers’ opinions to prepare appropriate content, review, and correction of the content through discussions with experts. (2) Content validity has been established by computing content validity index (CVI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;. (3) Construct validity has been&lt;br /&gt;established by correlating (Pearson’s-r) with another standardized instrument (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised) using multitrait procedure. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;Using CVI procedure, scale‑level CVI (S-CVI) universal agreement is 0.889; S-CVI average is 0.898. The item-level CVI is 0.90.&lt;br /&gt;The Pearson product-moment correlation coeffcient (r) was obtained by comparing caregiver burden scale-Indian population (CBS-IP) total with extraversion, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;r &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= -0.440, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;n &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 45, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;P &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 0.002; CBS-IP total with neuroticism, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;r &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 0.228, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;n &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 45, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;P &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 0.132; and CBS-IP total with psychoticism,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;r &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= -0.011, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;n &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 45, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;P &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;= 0.942. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;We believe that the new tool CBS-IP is a good empirical instrument for evaluating stressors on informal caregivers in India and possibly in some other countries in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0" style="color: #00652e;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Construct validity, content validity, neurologically ill&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/view/2019</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/download/2019/717717839</pdf_url></Article></Articles>
