<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Preventive Medicine (Int J Prev Med)</JournalTitle><Issn>2008-7802</Issn><Volume>10</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>07</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">Evaluation of Preventive Antibacterial Properties of a Glass‑Ionomer Cement Containing Purifed Powder of Salvia offcinalis: An In vitro Study</title><FirstPage>2080</FirstPage><LastPage>2080</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Departments of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Departments of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Departments of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>03</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;In this study, the anti‑&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Streptococcus mutans &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;and anti‑&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Lactobacillus casei &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;properties of a restorative glass‑ionomer cement (GIC) modifed with extract powder of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Salvia offcinalis &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;as a safe and effective herbal extract at weight concentration levels of 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25% are investigated. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;S. offcinalis &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;extract powder is provided by doing a multistep laboratory procedure and is fltered to obtain particles smaller than 50 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle4"&gt;µ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;. The GIC powder is modifed by adding extract powder in weight concentrations of 0.5% (Group II), 0.75% (Group III), 1% (Group IV), and 1.25% (Group V) to form experimental groups, each of 1 g. Five disk‑shaped samples, 1 cm in diameter and 2 mm height, of each group (including control group [Group I]) are prepared for each bacterial category of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;S. mutans &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;L. casei&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;. The twenty‑fve samples for each category are tested &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;in vitro &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;against strains of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;S. mutans &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;L. casei&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;. Following Agar diffusion tests, the inhibition zone diameters are recorded. The data are tested for normality by means of Kolmogorov–Smirnov procedure. The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests are used to perform a one‑way ANOVA and to do pair‑wise comparisons, respectively, at 5% signifcance level. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;The mean diameter of the inhibition zones are signifcantly different among the test groups and also the test groups and the control group except for the group with 0.5% in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;L. casei &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;category which shows no signifcant difference with the control group. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0"&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;The present study revealed direct inhibitory activitiesof &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;S. offcinalis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;‑containing GIC against &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;S. mutans &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;L. casei &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle2"&gt;in a dose‑response manner.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle0" style="color: #00652e;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="fontstyle3"&gt;Antimicrobial agents, dental material, glass ionomer, Salvia offcinalis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/view/2080</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/download/2080/717717899</pdf_url></Article></Articles>
