<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Preventive Medicine (Int J Prev Med)</JournalTitle><Issn>2008-7802</Issn><Volume>13</Volume><Issue>11</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2023</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>01</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis on Association of Serum Lipid Profile With Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence</title><FirstPage>2735</FirstPage><LastPage>2735</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Applied Physiology Research center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Community Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2023</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>25</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effect of serum lipids on the risk of breast cancer incidence. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched systematically from January 1998 to April 2019. Inclusion criteria were English observational studies (cohort or case-control) and the concentration of at least one of the lipid profile components (total cholesterol/triglycerides/low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol/high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol) measured before a diagnosis of breast cancer (BC). The studies were included in which the relative risk (RR) had been reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model was used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: A total of 25 studies were found, including 2,882,789 participants in cohort studies with 45,481 cases with BC, and 1983 BC cases and 2963 case-control studies. Combined RR of cohort studies for the highest versus lowest for the BC was LDL-C: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.89–1.01), triglycerides (TG): 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99; P = 0.02), total cholesterol (TC): 0.98 (95% CI: 0.91–1.05), and HDL-C: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.63–1.18). Combined RR of case-control studies for the highest versus lowest was LDL-C: 1.08 (95% CI: 0.78–1.48), TG: 1.73 (95% CI: 0.94–3.18), TC: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.80–1.29), and HDL-C: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65–0.97).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;: Based on the results, it can be concluded that only TG but not TC and/or LDL‑C had a significant inverse association with the risk of BC incidence. HDL‑C showed a significant protective effect against breast cancer in postmenopausal women and case-control studies.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/view/2735</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/download/2735/717718576</pdf_url></Article></Articles>
