Following PRISMA in a Systematic Review: Obligation or Authority?

Morteza Arab-Zozani, Soheil Hassanipour


Dear Editor,
Properly reporting of systematic reviews can improve evidence‑based medicine, evidence‑based management, and evidence‑informed policymaking in the health care
system.Various checklists have been developed to improve the reporting of these studies.

Full Text:



McMichael C, Waters E, Volmink J. Evidence‑based public

health: What does it offer developing countries? J Public Health


Swingler GH, Volmink J, Loannidis JP.Number of published

systematic reviews and global burden of disease: Database

analysis. BMJ 2003;327:1083‑4.

Volmink J, Siegfried N, Robertson K, Gülmezoglu AM.

Research synthesis and dissemination as a bridge to knowledge

management: The Cochrane collaboration. Bull World Health

Organ 2004;82:778‑83.

Shamsi M, Arab‑Zozani M, Mirzaei M. Methodological issue on

reporting of systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of rapid

ultrasound in shock. Bull Emerg Trauma 2019;7:337‑8.

Arab‑Zozani M, Ghoddoosi‑Nejad D, Dehghani M. Tips on

reporting a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 2018;6:71‑2.

Tajvar A, Arab‑Zozani M, Hassanipour S. Letter to “Work‑related

musculoskeletal disorders in Iranian dentists: A systematic

review and meta‑analysis”. Saf Health Work 2019;10:248‑9.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and

meta‑analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med


Dehkordi AH, Sarokhani D, Ghafari M, Mikelani M,

Mahmoodnia L. Effect of palliative care on quality of life and

survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic

review. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:147.