Mapping the Age of Laboratory Rabbit Strains to Human

Pallav Sengupta, Sulagna Dutta

Abstract


Rabbit strains find immense application in biomedical research with every strain having their discrete advantage in specific research endeavor. Acceptability of rabbit strains as laboratory animals owes to their breeding ease, availability, cost‑effectiveness, ethical conveniences, larger size, compared to rats and mice, and responsiveness. With respect to different life phases, the article displays that one human year is equivalent to: (1) in developmental phase, 56.77 days for New Zealand White (NZW) and New Zealand Red (NZR) rabbits, 71.01 days for Dutch belted and Polish rabbits, and 85.28 days for Californian rabbits; (2) in the prepubertal phase, 13.04 days for NZW and Dutch belted, 15.65 days for NZR and Californian, and 10.43 days for Polish rabbits; (3) in the adult phase, 18.25 days for NZW and Californian rabbits, 22.75 days for NZR, and 12 days for Dutch Belted and Polish rabbits; (4) during reproductive senescence, 42.94 days for NZW, NZR and Californian rabbits, 28.62 days for Dutch belted, and 25.05 days for Polish rabbits; (5) in the post‑senescence phase, 50.34 days for NZW, 25.17 days for NZR, Dutch Belted and Californian and 31.46 days for Polish rabbits. The laboratory rabbit strains differ in various physiological, developmental and genetic make‑ups, which also reflect upon the correlation of their age at different life stages with that of a human. The present article aids selection of laboratory rabbit strain of accurate age as per experimental need, by precisely relating the same with age of human considering different life stages.

Keywords


Aging; animal models; physiology; rabbits

Full Text:

PDF

References


Liebschner MA. Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone. Biomaterials 2004;25:1697‑714.2. Pritchett‑Corning K, Girod A, Avellaneda G, Fritz PE, Chou S, Brown M. Handbook of Clinical Signs in Rodents and Rabbits. 1st ed. Wilmington: Charles River; 2010.3. Graur D, Duret L, Gouy M. Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies). Nature 1996;379:333‑5.4. Mapara M, Thomas BS, Bhat KM. Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:111‑8.5. Stone LM. Rabbit Breeds: A Pocket Guide to 49 Essential Breeds. 1st ed. North Adams, MA: Storey Publishing; 2016.6. American Rabbit Breeders Association (ARBA). ARBA recognized breeds. Available from: https://www.arba.net/breeds.htm. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].7. Fox RR. The biology of the laboratory rabbit. In: Weisbroth SH, REF, Kraus AL, editors. Toxonomy and Genetics. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 1‑22.8. Sengupta P. The laboratory rat: Relating its age with human’s. Int J Prev Med 2013;4:624‑30.9. USDA/APHIS. The statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Report of European Union; 2010.10. USDA/APHIS. Annual report animal usage by fiscal year. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS); 2016. p. 1‑10.11. USDA/APHIS. Annual report animal usage by fiscal year. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), 2015. p. 1‑10.12. USDA/APHIS. Number of animals used in research from the first reporting year (FY 1973) to the present, in Animal Care Annual Report of Activities: Fiscal Year 2007. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): Animal and Plant Healthcare Inspection Service (APHIS); 2007.13. National Anti‑vivisection Society (NAVS). Rabbits in Research. Available from: https://www.navs.org/what‑we‑do/keep‑you‑informed/science‑corner/animals‑used‑in‑research/rabbits‑in‑research/#.WbjOdcYRUdU. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].14. National Anti‑vivisection Society (NAVS). Animal Research Numbers Continue Downward Trend According to Newly‑Released Report. Available from: https://www.navs.org/animal‑research‑numbers‑continue‑downward‑trend‑ according‑to‑newly‑released‑report/#.WbjOusYRUdU. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].15. USDA/APHIS. Annual report animal usage by fiscal year. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS); 2014. p. 1‑10.16. Sheail J. Rabbits and Their History. North Pomfret VT: David & Charles Inc.; 1971.17. The Jackson Laboratory. Handbook on Genetically Standardized JAX rabbits. 1st ed. Bar Harbor, ME: The Jackson Laboratory; 1975.18. Manning PJ, Ringler DH, Newcomer CE. The Biology of the Laboratory Rabbit. 2nd ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 2014.19. Suckow MA, Stevens KA, Wilson RP. The Laboratory Rabbit, Guniea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2012.20. Petguide. New Zealand Rabbit. Available from: http://www.petguide.com/breeds/rabbit/new‑zealand‑rabbit/. [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 15].21. Benbrook J. Dutch Rabbits. Available from: http://www.Greenpatchrabbits.com. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].

Whitman, Bob D. Domestic Rabbits and Their Histories: Breeds of the World. Leawood KS: Leathers Publishing; 2004.23. Petguide. Polish Rabbit. Available from: http://www.petguide.com/breeds/rabbit/polish‑rabbit/. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].24. Petguide. Californian Rabbit. Available from: http://www.petguide.com/breeds/rabbit/californian‑rabbit/. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].25. Russell RJ, Schilling PW. The Rabbit. San Antonio TX: Aeromed. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Airforce Base; 1973.26. Harkness JE, Wagner JE. The Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1989.27. Weisbroth SH, Flatt RE, Kraus AL. The Biology of the Laboratory Rabbit. New York: Academic Press; 1974.28. Lebas F, Coudert P, de Rochambeau H, Thebault RG. The Rabbit, Husbandry, Health and Production. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1997.29. Sengupta P. A small‑scale cross‑sectional study for the assessment of cardiorespiratory fiteness in relation to body composition and morphometric characters in fishermen of araku valley, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Prev Med 2014;5:552‑62.30. Sengupta P, Sahoo S. A cross sectional study to evaluate the fitness pattern among the young fishermen of coastal Orissa. Indian J Pub Health Res Dev 2013;4:171.31. Verlannahill Rabbitry. All about the Dutch rabbit. Available from: http://www.verlannahill.com/AboutDutch.htm. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].32. Rabbitmatters. The Polish Rabbit. Available from: http://www.rabbitmatters.com/polish‑rabbit.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].33. Dutta S, Sengupta P. Age of laboratory hamster and human: Drawing the connexion. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12:49‑56.34. Dutta S, Sengupta P. Men and mice: Relating their ages. Life Sci 2016;152:244‑8.35. Adams CE. Reproductive performance of rabbits on a low protein diet. Lab Anim 1983;17:340.36. American University of Beirut. Rabbits. p. 1‑5. Available from: https://website.aub.edu.lb/fm/medicalresearch/AnimalCareFac/Documents/Document%207‑%20Rabbits.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 30].37. Dutta S, Sengupta P. Rabbits and men: relating their ages. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2018;29:427‑35.38. Morton DB, Glover TD. Sperm transport in the female rabbit: The effect of inseminate volume and sperm density. J Reprod Fertil 1974;38:139‑46.39. Elkomy AE, Abd El‑Hady AM, Elghalid OA. Dietary boron supplementation and its impact on semen characteristics and physiological status of adult male rabbits. Asian J Poultry Sci 2015;9:85.40. Kilborn SH, Trudel G, Uhthoff H. Review of growth plate closure compared with age at sexual maturity and lifespan in laboratory animals. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2002;41:21‑6.41. Adams CE. Induction of ovulation and A.I. techniques in the rabbit. Vet Rec 1972;1972:194.