Comparison of the Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients after CABG
Abstract
Background: After a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), diabetic patients deal with various hemodynamic disorders. This study aimed to compare the effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on the functional capacity of diabetic and nondiabetic patients following CABG.
Methods: This descriptive‑analytical study was performed on 40 diabetic and nondiabetic patients attending a similar CR program following CABG. The subjects were selected by convenience sampling and were divided into two diabetes and nondiabetes groups. All patients attended 24 exercise sessions held 3 days a week. The functional capacity of patients was measured and recorded with the metabolic equivalent of Task criterion before and after the CR program. In addition, data analysis was performed in SPSS version 19.
Results: In this study, the mean age of the diabetic and nondiabetic patients was 54.45 ± 5.82 and 56.85 ± 5.36 years, respectively. There was no significant difference between the research groups regarding the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P > 0.05). The mean functional capacity in the diabetes and nondiabetes groups was 4.5 ± 0.79 and 5.2 ± 1.7 before the rehabilitation, respectively. However, the results of Mann–Whitney U‑test were indicative of a lack of a significant difference in this respect (P > 0.05). After the CR program, the mean functional capacity in the diabetes and nondiabetes groups was 5.7 ± 1.31 and 6.3 ± 1.7, respectively, demonstrating an insignificant difference in this regard (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: According to the results of the study, there was no significant difference between the diabetic and nondiabetic patients, who underwent CABG, after a CR program. However, replication of the study is warranted.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Jahanbakhsh M, Ehteshami A, Afkhami S. Developing “Aryan:”
Diabetes self‑care mobile application. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:59.
Honarvar B, Banakar M, Hassani N, Movahednezhad Y,
Gheibi Z, Bagheri Lankarani K. From iceberg of pre‑diabetes
to poor glycemic control in diabetics: An elderly based study in
Shiraz, South of Iran. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:171.
Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E,
Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2
diabetes, 2015: A patient‑centered approach: Update to a
position statement of the American diabetes association and the
European association for the study of diabetes. Diabetes Care
;38:140‑9.
Kouhestani HR, Baghcheghi N, Zand S. Impact of teaching cardiac rehabilitation programs on electrocardiogram changes
among patients with myocardial infraction. IJNR 2010;5:6‑12.
de Macedo RM, Faria‑Neto JR, Costantini CO, Casali D,
Muller AP, Costantini CR, et al. Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation:
A new challenge for evidence based physiotherapy. World J
Cardiol 2011;3:248‑55.
Rion JH, Kautz DD. The walk to save: Benefits of inpatient
cardiac rehabilitation. Medsurg Nurs 2016;25:159‑63.
Jamshidpour B, Attarbashi Moghaddam B, Vassaghi B, Mirzaii E,
Nejatian M. The effects of cardiac rehabilitation on changes in
anthropometric measurements of obesity among diabetic and non
diabetic men with coronary artery disease referred to cardiac
rehabilitation. J Mod Rehabil 2012;6:30‑6.
Lavie CJ, Arena R, Swift DL, Johannsen NM, Sui X, Lee D‑c,
et al. Exercise and the cardiovascular system: Clinical science
and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Res 2015;117:207‑19.
Jones MI, Greenfield S, Jolly K. Patients’ experience of home
and hospital based cardiac rehabilitation: A focus group study.
Eur J Cardiovasc 2009;8:9‑17.
Sandesara PB, Lambert CT, Gordon NF, Fletcher GF,
Franklin BA, Wenger NK, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and risk
reduction: Time to “rebrand and reinvigorate”. J Am Coll Cardiol
;65:389‑95.
Lange K, Swift P, Pańkowska E, Danne T. Diabetes education
in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014;15(Suppl.
:77‑85.
Abaci A, Oğuzhan A, Kahraman S, Eryol NK, Unal S,
Arinç H, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on formation of
coronary collateral vessels. Circulation 1999;99:2239‑42.
Marks JB, Raskin P. Cardiovascular risk in diabetes: A brief
review. J Diabetes Complications 2000;14:108‑15.
Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Mortality in adults with and
without diabetes in a national cohort of the US population,
–1993. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1138‑45.
Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, Zwisler A‑D,
Rees K, Martin N, et al. Exercise‑based cardiac rehabilitation
for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and
meta‑analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1‑12.
Davies EJ, Moxham T, Rees K, Singh S, Coats AJ, Ebrahim S,
et al. Exercise training for systolic heart failure: Cochrane
systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur J Heart Fail
;12:706‑15.
Ebrahimi M, Kazemi‑Bajestani S, Ghayour‑Mobarhan M,
Ferns G. Coronary artery disease and its risk factors status in
Iran: A review. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2011;13:610‑23.
Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M.
Cardiovascular disease in Europe: Epidemiological update. Eur
Heart J 2013;34:3028‑34.
Andraos C, Arthur HM, Oh P, Chessex C, Brister S, Grace SL.
Women’s preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program
model: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol
;22:1513‑22.
Abdella NA, Mojiminiyi OA. Clinical applications of
adiponectin measurements in type 2 diabetes mellitus:
Screening, diagnosis, and marker of diabetes control. Dis
Markers 2018;2018:5187940.
McPhee PG, Winegard KJ, MacDonald MJ, McKelvie RS,
Millar PJ. Importance of early cardiac rehabilitation on changes
in exercise capacity: A retrospective pilot study. Appl Physiol
Nutr Metab 2015;40:1314‑7.
Pilannejad S, Naimi SS, Okhovatian F, Attarbashi MB,
Jamalian SA, Akbarzadeh BA. Effect of the first phase of cardiac
rehabilitation on quality of life and functional capacity of patients
with heart failure. Scientific J Rehabil Med 2017;6:82‑90.
Saremi A, Sadeghi M, Shahrjerdi S, Hashemi S. An eight‑weeks
cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with coronary artery
diseases: Effects on chronic low‑grade inflammation and
cardiometabolic risk factors. Payesh 2017;16:160‑9.
El Demerdash S, Khorshid H, Salah I, Abdel Rahman MA,
Salem AM. Cardiac rehabilitation improves the ischemic burden
in patients with ischemic heart disease who are not suitable for
revascularization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2015;16:280‑3.
Siegmund LA, Albert NM, McClelland MS, Bena JF,
Morrison SL. Functional capacity but not early uptake of cardiac
rehabilitation predicts readmission in patients with metabolic
syndrome. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2018;33:306‑12.