The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Versions of the Patient Health Questionnaires 9 and 2 as Screening Tools for Detecting Depression among University Students

Rasoul Mohamadian, Habibolah Khazaie, Seyed Mojtaba Ahmadi, Mehdi Fatmizade, Susan Ghahremani, Hossein Sadeghi, Zohreh Ansari, Ahmadreza Ahmadi, Sadighe Zare

Abstract


Background: Among the common mental disorders in societies, depression is one of the most common mental disorders that affects all groups and classes of society. Students are among the groups with the highest rates of depression. Therefore, the need for a short and effective tool for screening and early detection of depression is felt. The aim of this research is to determine validity, reliability and the best cut‑off point of the patient health questionnaires‑9 (PHQ‑9) and patient health questionnaires‑2 (PHQ‑2) in university students. Methods: This cross‑sectional study was conducted on 246 students of Kermanshah University of medical science in Kermanshah province of Iran. They completed the PHQ‑2, PHQ‑9, and the Beck Depression Inventory‑II (BDI‑II). A structured interview was used to diagnose depression. To analyze the data, Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency, the intra‑class correlation (ICC) for test–retest reliability, confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, Pearson Correlation for Convergent validity, and receiver‑operating characteristic (ROC) curve for Criterion validity was used. Results: The mean age of the participants was 20.43 ± 2.29. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for PHQ‑9 and PHQ‑2 was 0.82 and 0.80, respectively. The test–retest reliability based on intra‑class correlation (ICC) for PHQ‑9 and PHQ‑2 after two weeks was 0.81 and 0.73, respectively (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the PHQ‑9 and PHQ‑2 with the BDI‑II was 0.74 and 0.64, respectively (P < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that two-factor model and one factor model had good model fit. The best cut‑off point score for the PHQ‑9 was 10 with a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.93, and the best cut‑off point score for the PHQ‑2 was 3 with the sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.92. Conclusions: The PHQ‑9 and PHQ‑2 are suitable tools to screen depression in the university students in Iran.

Keywords


Depression; patient health questionnaires; psychometric; University students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Weinberger A, Gbedemah M, Martinez A, Nash D, Galea S,

Goodwin R. Trends in depression prevalence in the USA from

to 2015: Widening disparities in vulnerable groups. Psychol

Med 2018;48:1308‑15.

Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P. Kaplan and Sadock's synopsis

of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry, 11th ed.

Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.

Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ,

Guille C, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms,

and suicidal ideation among medical students: A systematic

review and meta‑analysis. JAMA 2016;316:2214‑36.

Loloie M, Haghdoost AA, Bazrafshan A, Okhovati M,

Mokhtari AM, Zare M. Factors affecting undergraduate students’

academic failure in Kerman University of Medical Sciences,

Iran; A case‑control study. Strides in Development of Medical

Education 2017;13:505‑14.

Daraei M. An investigation of the relationship between

depression and self‑esteem with academic performance. Yafteh

;19:117‑26.

Azarniveh M, Tavakoli Khormizi S. Depression and academic

achievements in athletes and non‑athletes university students:

A comparative study. Iran J Nurs 2015;28:1‑10.

Zhang YL, Liang W, Chen ZM, Zhang HM, Zhang JH,

Weng XQ, et al. Validity and reliability of Patient Health

Questionnaire‐9 and Patient Health Questionnaire‐2 to screen for

depression among college students in China. Asia Pac Psychiatry

;5:268‑75.

Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Systematic review

of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological

distress among US and Canadian medical students. Acad Med

;81:354‑73.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ‑9: Validity

of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med

;16:606‑13.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health

Questionnaire‑2: Validity of a two‑item depression screener. Med

Care 2003;41:1284‑92.

Sawaya H, Atoui M, Hamadeh A, Zeinoun P, Nahas Z.

Adaptation and initial validation of the Patient Health

Questionnaire–9 (PHQ‑9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7

Questionnaire (GAD‑7) in an Arabic speaking Lebanese

psychiatric outpatient sample. Psychiatry Res 2016;239:245‑52.

Umegaki Y, Todo N. Psychometric properties of the Japanese

CES–D, SDS, and PHQ–9 depression scales in university

students. Psychol Assess 2017;29:354‑9.

Muramatsu K, Miyaoka H, Kamijima K, Muramatsu Y,

Tanaka Y, Hosaka M, et al. Performance of the Japanese version

of the Patient Health Questionnaire‑9 (J‑PHQ‑9) for depression

in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2018;52:64‑9.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Löwe B. The patient health

questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales:

A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010;32:345‑59.

Myers ND, Ahn S, Jin Y. Sample size and power estimates

for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport:

A Monte Carlo approach. Res Q Exerc Sport 2011;82:412‑23.

First MB, Williams J, Karg RS, Spitzer RL. User’s Guide to

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‑5 Disorders (SCID‑5‑CV)

Clinical Version. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric

Publishing; 2015.

Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory‑II.

San Antonio 1996;78:490‑8.

Rahimi C. Application of the beck depression inventory‑II in

Iranian university students. Clinical Psychology & Personality

;2:173‑88.

Leech NL, Barrett KC, Morgan GA. SPSS for Intermediate

Statistics: Use and Interpretation. Psychology Press; 2005.

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass

correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of

chiropractic medicine. 2016;15:155-63.

Dancey CP, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology, 7th

ed. Pearson education; 2017.

Schermelleh‑Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating

the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and

descriptive goodness‑of‑fit measures. Methods of Psychological

Research Online 2003;8:23‑74.

Safari S, Baratloo A, Elfil M, Negida A. Evidence based

emergency medicine; part 5 receiver operating curve and area

under the curve. Emergency 2016;4:111.

Stafford L, Berk M, Jackson HJ. Validity of the hospital anxiety

and depression scale and patient health questionnaire‑9 to screen

for depression in patients with coronary artery disease. Gen Hosp

Psychiatry 2007;29:417‑24.

González‑Blanch C, Medrano LA, Muñoz‑Navarro R,

Ruíz‑Rodríguez P, Moriana JA, Limonero JT, et al. Factor

structure and measurement invariance across various

demographic groups and over time for the PHQ‑9 in primary

care patients in Spain. PLoS one 2018;13:e0193356.

Yoon S, Lee Y, Han C, Pae CU, Yoon HK, Patkar AA, et al.

Usefulness of the Patient Health Questionnaire‑9 for Korean

medical students. Acad Psychiatry 2014;38:661‑7.

Kocalevent R‑D, Hinz A, Brähler E. Standardization of the

depression screener patient health questionnaire (PHQ‑9) in the

general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013;35:551‑5.

Granillo MT. Structure and function of the Patient Health

Questionnaire‑9 among Latina and non‑Latina White female

college students. Journal of the society for social work and

Research 2012;3:80‑93.

Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut‑off

score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health

Questionnaire (PHQ‑9): A meta‑analysis. CMAJ

;184:E191‑6.