Role of Overcorrecting Minus Lens Therapy in Intermittent Exotropia for Prevention of Constant Exotropia in Children Under the Age of 7 Years

Yousef Alizadeh, Abdolreza Medghalchi, Soheil Soltanipour, Mohammad J. Mohammadi, Reza Soltani‑Moghadam, Hassan Behboudi, Ebrahim Azaripour, Altinai Soleimani

Abstract


Background: The basis of the overcorrecting minus lens is to induce compliance and consequently prevent constant exotropia. Some previous studies advocated early surgical therapy and others suggested over‑minus treatment. Our purpose is to evaluate the success rate of the over‑minus lens. Methods: This descriptive cross‑sectional study was carried out on 106 patients under the age of 7 years with intermittent exotropia (IXT) who attended Amir‑Al‑Momenin Hospital at Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The data was gathered by a form including sex, age, level of cycloplegic refraction, the amount of deviation before and after using the over‑minus glasses, visual acuity, the amount of the over‑minus glasses, duration of treatment, recovery, and follow‑up. The success rate was defined as decreasing exotropia to less than ten prism diopters or exophoria. Results: A total of 106 patients with a mean age of 2.25 ± 0.74 years were enrolled in this study. The mean exotropia before and after treatment was 20.96 ± 8.20 and 12.16 ± 11.04 prism diopters, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.002). The mean refractive spherical and astigmatic errors (cycloplegic refraction) were +1.34 ± 1.07 and −0.32 ± 0.72 diopters, respectively. At the end of the follow‑up, exotropia increased in 5.6% of patients, there was no change in 15% of patients with a mean deviation of 25.0 ± 6.06 prism diopters, and 79.24% of patients were treated successfully. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, treatment of IXT by over‑correcting lenses can be a safe procedure and effective in preventing exotropia.

Keywords


Exotropia; eye deviation; glasses; over‑minus; prevention

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jenkins R. Demographics Geographic variations in the prevalence

and management of exotropia. Am Orthopt J 1992;42:82‑7.

McKean‑Cowdin R, Cotter SA, Tarczy‑Hornoch K, Wen G,

Kim J, Borchert M, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus

in Asian and non‑Hispanic white preschool children: Multi‑ethnic

pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2117‑24.

Govindan M, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence

and types of childhood exotropia: A population‑based study.

Ophthalmol 2005;112:104‑8.

Cooper JMN. Intermittent exotropia basic and divergence

excess (major review). Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 1993;8:185‑216.

Hatt SR, Gnanaraj L. Interventions for intermittent

exotropia (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev

;CD003737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003737.pub2.

Hoyt CS, Pesic A. The many enigmas of intermittent exotropia.

Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1280‑2.

Rowe F, Noonan C, Freeman G, DeBell J. Intervention for

intermittent distance exotropia with overcorrecting minus lenses.

Eye 2009;23:320‑5.

Caltrider N, Jampolsky A. Overcorrecting minus lens therapy for

treatment of intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1160‑5.

Donaldson PJ, Kemp, EG. An initial study of the treatment of

intermittent exotropia by minus overcorrection. Br Orthopt J

;48:41‑3.

Goodacre H. Minus overcorrection: Conservative treatment of

intermittent exotropia in the young child—A comparative study.

Aust Orthopt J 1985;22:9‑17.

Kennedy J. The correction of divergent strabismus with concave

lenses. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1954;31:605‑14.

Merrick F. Use of concave lenses in the management of

intermittent divergent squint. Aust Orthopt J 1975;12:13‑7.

Reynolds JD, Wackerhagen M, Olitsky SE. Over minus lens

therapy for intermittent exotropia. Am Orthopt J 1994;44:86‑91.

Watts P, Tippings E, Al‑Madfai H. Intermittent exotropia,

overcorrecting minus lenses, and the Newcastle scoring system.

J AAPOS 2005;9:460‑4.

Coffey B, Wick B, Cotter S, Scharre J, Horner D. Treatment

options in intermittent exotropia: A critical appraisal. Optom Vis

Sci 1992;69:386‑404.

Rutstein RP, Marsh‑Tootle W, London R. Changes in refractive

error for exotropes treated with over minus lenses. Optom Vis

Sci 1989;66:487‑91.

Romano PE, Wilson MF. Survey of current management of

intermittent exotropia in the USA and Canada. In: Campos EC,

editor. Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the International

Strabismological Association 1990, Australia, 1990.

Kushner BJ. Does Overcorrecting minus lens therapy for

intermittent exotropia cause myopia? Arch Ophthalmol

;117:638‑42.

Haggerty H, Richardson S, Hrisos S, Strong NP, Clarke MP. The

Newcastle control score: A new method of grading the severity of

intermittent distance exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:233‑5.

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Chen AM, Holmes JM,

et al. A randomized trial evaluating short‑term effectiveness of

overminus lenses in children 3 to 6 years of age with intermittent

exotropia. Ophthalmol 2016;123:2127‑36.

Bayramlar H, Gurturk AY, Sari U, Karadag R. Overcorrecting

minus lens therapy in patients with intermittent exotropia: Should

it be the first therapeutic choice? Int Ophthalmol 2017;37:385‑90.

Paula JS, Ibrahim FM, Martins MC, Bicas HE, Velasco e Cruz AA.

Refractive error changes in children with intermittent exotropia

under over minus lens therapy. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009;72:751‑4.

Koklanis K, Georgievski Z, Zhang K. The use of distance

stereoacuity assessment in determining the effectiveness of minus

lenses in intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2010;14:488‑93.