Iran’s Struggling Health System: An Increase in Natural Childbirth: A Case Study

Alireza Jabbari, Mohammad Hossein Yarmohamadian, Marziye Hadian

Abstract


Background: The 7th package of health reform in Iran has been implemented in May 15, 1393, is concerned with the “promotion of natural childbirth.” It has been focusing on reducing cesarean section (CS) and promoting normal vaginal delivery (NVD) as broadly as possible. This study
evaluated the changes in the vaginal delivery and cesarean before and after implementation of the 7th package of health reform in public and private hospitals of Isfahan Province in 2014.

Methods: This was a quasi‑experimental research. The population of this study contained all public and private hospitals in Isfahan Province covered by the Health Reform Program. It included 22 public and 6 private hospitals. The data collected from the vice chancellor of treatment in 6 months before and after the implementation of the program have been analyzed. SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and independent t‑test have been employed for data analysis.

Results: It was demonstrated that the increasing rate of NVD (P = 0.001) and decreasing rate of CS in public hospitals (P = 0.027) after the implementation of the plan were signifcant. On the other hand, the increasing rate of CS in private hospitals was signifcant (P = 0.026).

Conclusions: Although this scheme has achieved its targets in public hospitals of Isfahan Province, it has not met its objectives in private hospitals. It seems CS operations were shifted from public hospitals to
private ones, which is conflict with the objectives of the health reform plan.

Keywords: Cesarean section, health reform, Iran, Isfahan, normal vaginal delivery


Full Text:

PDF

References


Sauls DJ. Effects of labor support on mothers, babies, and birth

outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:733‑41.

Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GM.

Caesarean section for non‑medical reasons at term. Cochrane

Libr 2012;3:434.

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology

and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75‑84.

Karami K, Najafian M, Shahri P, Faizi S, Noorifard Z.

Comparison of frequency vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Iran

J Public Health 2009;38:97‑102.

Rivlin ME, Martin RW. Manual of clinical problems in obstetrics

and gynecology. 4th ed. Little Brown and Company; London:

p. 510.

Khani S, Shabankhani B. Can the caesarean rate be reduced in

Mazandaran. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2004;14:43‑51.

Firoozi M, Hadizadeh Talasaz F. The survey of attitude of

gynecologists and midwives about vaginal birth after caesarean

delivery and barriers from their views. Ofogh Danesh J

;12:26‑33.

Karlström A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I. Maternal and infant

outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical

indication: Findings from a Swedish case‑control study. BJOG

;120:479‑86.

Kilsztajn S, Carmo MS, Machado LC Jr., Lopes ES, Lima LZ.

Caesarean sections and maternal mortality in Sao Paulo. Eur J

Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:64‑9.

Rahimikian F, Mirmohamadaliei M, Mehran A, Aboozari

Ghforoodi K, Salmaani Barough N. Effect of education designed

based on health belief model on choosing delivery mode. Hayat

;14:25‑32.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S,

Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated

with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med

;351:2581‑9.

Boskabadi H, Zakerihamidi M, Bagheri F. Outcomes of vaginal

delivery and caesarean in Mashhad Ghaem University Hospital.

Tehran Univ Med J 2014;71:807‑15.

Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Gissler M. Severe maternal morbidity

and the mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

;87:662‑8.

Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Risk of

respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective

caesarean section: Cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:85‑7.

DiGirolamo AM, Grummer‑Strawn LM, Fein SB. Effect

of maternity‑care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics

;122 Suppl 2:S43‑9.

Shariat M. Rate of caesarean and factors related to that in

Maternity of Tehran. Payesh J 2002;3:1.

Mohammadi TS, Kiani AA, Heydari M. The survey on

tendencies of primiparous women for selecting the mode of

delivery. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

;3:54‑9.

Moeini B, Allahverdipour H, Mahjoub H, Bashirian S. Assessing

pregnant women’s beliefs, behavioral intention and predictive

factors for caesarean section in Hamadan. Iranian Journal of

Obstetrics, Gyneocology and Infertility 2011;14:37‑44.

Bahonar A, Shaebani A, Aghajani M. Determinants of caesarean

and its trend in damghan, Iran. Iran J Epidemiol 2010;6:33‑8.

Moayed MS, Sohrabi Z. The trend analysis of caesarean section

rate in a hospital, Tehran, Iran. Payesh 2011;10:261‑4.

Tabandeh A, Kashani E. The prevalence of caesarean among

employed educated women of medical science groups in Gorgan.

Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences Summer

;9:67‑70.

Mohammad BA, Tabatabaei S, Mohammad SN, Yazdani M.

Factors influencing caesarean delivery method in Shiraz

hospitals. IJN 2009;21:37‑45.

Socol ML, Garcia PM, Peaceman AM, Dooley SL. Reducing

caesarean births at a primarily private university hospital. Am J

Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1748‑58.

Sanchez‑Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Peterson HB,

Martinez‑Schnell B, Thompson RJ. Reducing caesarean sections

at a teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1081‑8.

Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit

cycle to reduce caesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol

;174:199‑205.