Iran’s Struggling Health System: An Increase in Natural Childbirth: A Case Study
Abstract
Background: The 7th package of health reform in Iran has been implemented in May 15, 1393, is concerned with the “promotion of natural childbirth.” It has been focusing on reducing cesarean section (CS) and promoting normal vaginal delivery (NVD) as broadly as possible. This study
evaluated the changes in the vaginal delivery and cesarean before and after implementation of the 7th package of health reform in public and private hospitals of Isfahan Province in 2014.
Methods: This was a quasi‑experimental research. The population of this study contained all public and private hospitals in Isfahan Province covered by the Health Reform Program. It included 22 public and 6 private hospitals. The data collected from the vice chancellor of treatment in 6 months before and after the implementation of the program have been analyzed. SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and independent t‑test have been employed for data analysis.
Results: It was demonstrated that the increasing rate of NVD (P = 0.001) and decreasing rate of CS in public hospitals (P = 0.027) after the implementation of the plan were signifcant. On the other hand, the increasing rate of CS in private hospitals was signifcant (P = 0.026).
Conclusions: Although this scheme has achieved its targets in public hospitals of Isfahan Province, it has not met its objectives in private hospitals. It seems CS operations were shifted from public hospitals to
private ones, which is conflict with the objectives of the health reform plan.
Keywords: Cesarean section, health reform, Iran, Isfahan, normal vaginal delivery
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Sauls DJ. Effects of labor support on mothers, babies, and birth
outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:733‑41.
Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GM.
Caesarean section for non‑medical reasons at term. Cochrane
Libr 2012;3:434.
Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology
and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75‑84.
Karami K, Najafian M, Shahri P, Faizi S, Noorifard Z.
Comparison of frequency vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Iran
J Public Health 2009;38:97‑102.
Rivlin ME, Martin RW. Manual of clinical problems in obstetrics
and gynecology. 4th ed. Little Brown and Company; London:
p. 510.
Khani S, Shabankhani B. Can the caesarean rate be reduced in
Mazandaran. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2004;14:43‑51.
Firoozi M, Hadizadeh Talasaz F. The survey of attitude of
gynecologists and midwives about vaginal birth after caesarean
delivery and barriers from their views. Ofogh Danesh J
;12:26‑33.
Karlström A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I. Maternal and infant
outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical
indication: Findings from a Swedish case‑control study. BJOG
;120:479‑86.
Kilsztajn S, Carmo MS, Machado LC Jr., Lopes ES, Lima LZ.
Caesarean sections and maternal mortality in Sao Paulo. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:64‑9.
Rahimikian F, Mirmohamadaliei M, Mehran A, Aboozari
Ghforoodi K, Salmaani Barough N. Effect of education designed
based on health belief model on choosing delivery mode. Hayat
;14:25‑32.
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S,
Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated
with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med
;351:2581‑9.
Boskabadi H, Zakerihamidi M, Bagheri F. Outcomes of vaginal
delivery and caesarean in Mashhad Ghaem University Hospital.
Tehran Univ Med J 2014;71:807‑15.
Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Gissler M. Severe maternal morbidity
and the mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
;87:662‑8.
Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Risk of
respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective
caesarean section: Cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:85‑7.
DiGirolamo AM, Grummer‑Strawn LM, Fein SB. Effect
of maternity‑care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics
;122 Suppl 2:S43‑9.
Shariat M. Rate of caesarean and factors related to that in
Maternity of Tehran. Payesh J 2002;3:1.
Mohammadi TS, Kiani AA, Heydari M. The survey on
tendencies of primiparous women for selecting the mode of
delivery. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences
;3:54‑9.
Moeini B, Allahverdipour H, Mahjoub H, Bashirian S. Assessing
pregnant women’s beliefs, behavioral intention and predictive
factors for caesarean section in Hamadan. Iranian Journal of
Obstetrics, Gyneocology and Infertility 2011;14:37‑44.
Bahonar A, Shaebani A, Aghajani M. Determinants of caesarean
and its trend in damghan, Iran. Iran J Epidemiol 2010;6:33‑8.
Moayed MS, Sohrabi Z. The trend analysis of caesarean section
rate in a hospital, Tehran, Iran. Payesh 2011;10:261‑4.
Tabandeh A, Kashani E. The prevalence of caesarean among
employed educated women of medical science groups in Gorgan.
Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences Summer
;9:67‑70.
Mohammad BA, Tabatabaei S, Mohammad SN, Yazdani M.
Factors influencing caesarean delivery method in Shiraz
hospitals. IJN 2009;21:37‑45.
Socol ML, Garcia PM, Peaceman AM, Dooley SL. Reducing
caesarean births at a primarily private university hospital. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1748‑58.
Sanchez‑Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Peterson HB,
Martinez‑Schnell B, Thompson RJ. Reducing caesarean sections
at a teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1081‑8.
Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit
cycle to reduce caesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol
;174:199‑205.