Implementing Tuberculosis Close‑contact Investigation in a Tertiary Hospital in Iran
Abstract
Background: Close contact investigation is the essential key in tuberculosis (TB) case fnding and an effective strategy for TB control program within any society.
Methods: In this prospective study, 1186 close family contacts of hospitalized TB patients (index) in a referral TB hospital in Tehran‑Iran
were passively studied. These people were studied to rollout TB infection and disease. Demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory data of these individuals were reviewed and summarized for analysis.
Results: A total of 886 (74.4%) close‑family contacts completed their investigation. The index TB patients of these individuals were sputum smear negative for acid‑fast bacilli in 137 cases (11.6%) and the rest were
smear positive. A total of 610 (68.8%) close‑family contact ruled out for TB infection or disease (Group I). A total of 244 cases (27.5%) had latent TB infection (Group II) and active TB (Group III) was confrmed in 32 cases (3.6%). A signifcant difference was shown for female gender, signs and symptoms, family size, and positive radiological fnding between Group I and Group II. The study of index parameter including positive sputum smear/culture did not reveal any signifcant difference, but positive cavitary
lesion signifcantly more has seen in active TB group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: This study emphasizes on sign and symptoms and radiological fnding in TB contact investigation, where index parameters including positive smear/culture, does not implicate any priority. Although cavitary lesions in index patient have more accompanied by active TB, close contact study should include all of TB indexes. This investigation should include chest radiography for these individuals.
Keywords: Contact investigation, passive case fnding, tuberculosis
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Nathan C. What can immunology contribute to the control of the
world’s leading cause of death from bacterial infection? Immunol
Rev 2015;264:2‑5.
Mitchison DA. Assessment of new sterilizing drugs for treating
pulmonary tuberculosis by culture at 2 months. Am Rev Respir
Dis 1993;147:1062‑3.
Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, Maher D, Williams BG,
Raviglione MC, et al. The growing burden of tuberculosis:
Global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch
Intern Med 2003;163:1009‑21.
Bhattacharjya C, Sahu D, Patel SK, Saggurti N, Pandey A.
Causes of death among HIV‑infected adults registered in selected
anti‑retroviral therapy centers in North‑Eastern India. World J
AIDS 2015;5:90.
Dirlikov E, Raviglione M, Scano F. Global tuberculosis
control: Toward the 2015 targets and beyond. Ann Intern Med
;163:52‑8.
World Health Organization. TB Country Profile‑Report
Available from: https://extranet.who.int/sree/
Reports?op=Replet&name=%2FWHO_HQ_Reports%2FG2%2F
PROD%2FEXT%2FTBCountryProfile&ISO2=IR&LAN=EN&ou
ttype=pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 25].
Case KK, Hallett TB, Gregson S, Porter K, Ghys PD. Development
and future directions for the joint United Nations Programme on
HIV/AIDS estimates. AIDS 2014;28 Suppl 4:S411‑4.
Bemis K, editor. Identifying Tuberculosis Transmission from
Smear‑Negative Patients Using Genotype and Epidemiologic
Links‑Suburban Cook County, Illinois, 2009‑2015. 2016 CSTE
Annual Conference. CSTE; 2016.
Shaw JB, Wynn‑Williams N. Infectivity of pulmonary tuberculosis
in relation to sputum status. Am Rev Tuberc 1954;69:724‑32.
Grzybowski S, Barnett GD, Styblo K. Contacts of cases of active
pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull Int Union Tuberc 1975;50:90‑106.
Lohmann EM, Koster BF, le Cessie S, Kamst‑van Agterveld MP,
van Soolingen D, Arend SM, et al. Grading of a positive sputum
smear and the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012;16:1477‑84.
Shapiro AE, Variava E, Rakgokong MH, Moodley N, Luke B,
Salimi S, et al. Community‑based targeted case finding for
tuberculosis and HIV in household contacts of patients with
tuberculosis in South Africa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
;185:1110‑6.
Hernández‑Garduño E, Cook V, Kunimoto D, Elwood RK,
Black WA, FitzGerald JM, et al. Transmission of tuberculosis
from smear negative patients: A molecular epidemiology study.
Thorax 2004;59:286‑90.
Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Zellweger JP, Sotgiu G,
D’Ambrosio L, Centis R, et al. Old ideas to innovate tuberculosis
control: Preventive treatment to achieve elimination. Eur Respir
J 2013;42:785‑801.
Gilpin TP, Hammond M. Active case‑finding – For the whole
community or for tuberculosis contacts only? S Afr Med J
;72:260‑2.
World Health Organization. Recommendations for Investigating
Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis in Low and
Middle‑Income Countries. WHO/HTM/TB/2012.9. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2012.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on the Management of
Latent Tuberculosis Infection. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.01. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2015. Available form: http://apps.
who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/136471/1/9789241548908_eng.pdf.
[Last accessed on 2017 Nov 25].
World Health Organization. Treatment of Tuberculosis
Guidelines. 4th ed. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.420. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2010. Available form: http://apps.who.int/
iris/bitstream/10665/44165/1/9789241547833_eng.pdf. [Last
accessed on 2017 Nov 25].
Dasgupta K, Schwartzman K, Marchand R, Tennenbaum TN,
Brassard P, Menzies D, et al. Comparison of cost‑effectiveness
of tuberculosis screening of close contacts and foreign‑born
populations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2079‑86.
Binkin NJ, Vernon AA, Simone PM, McCray E, Miller BI,
Schieffelbein CW, et al. Tuberculosis prevention and control
activities in the United States: An overview of the organization
of tuberculosis services. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:663‑74.
Marks SM, Taylor Z, Qualls NL, Shrestha‑Kuwahara RJ,
Wilce MA, Nguyen CH, et al. Outcomes of contact investigations
of infectious tuberculosis patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
;162:2033‑8.
Reichler MR, Reves R, Bur S, Thompson V, Mangura BT,
Ford J, et al. Evaluation of investigations conducted to detect