Early Detection of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Based on Serial Measurement of Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin Hormone in Women with Molar Pregnancy

Roya Riahi, Abbas Rahimiforoushani, Keramat Nourijelyani, Nooshin Akbari Sharak, Mahmood Bakhtiyari

Abstract


Background: The majority of studies which investigate the predicted power of Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels to the occurrence of Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) considered the effect of a single measurement of hCG or used classical statistical methods without considering the endogenous marker. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between weekly measurements of β‑hCG with time to GTN occurring, using a robust Bayesian joint modeling.

Methods: Data of 201 women with a molar pregnancy were considered for this retrospective cohort study. After the first measurement of β‑hCG in 48 hours post evacuation of mole, the other titration was performed on a weekly basis until three consecutive normal titers. The association between serial measurements of β‑hCG and risk of GTN occurring were assessed by the classic and Bayesian joint modeling and in separate analysis the mixed linear effect and Cox‑PH model were used.

Results: The mean age (SD) of participants was 26.6 (6.55) year. The GTN was occurred among 14.9% of patients. The association parameter using Bayesian approach was estimated as 1.30 (95% CI: 0.44 to 2.20) which showed one unit increase in the log β‑hCG corresponds to the 2.80‑times increase in the hazard for the occurrence of GTN (Hazard Ratio: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.55 to 8.98).

Conclusions: Findings of this study revealed that weekly measurements of β‑hCG are an important and reliable biomarker to early detection of developing of molar pregnancy to persistent GTN.


Keywords


Chorionic gonadotropin; gestational trophoblastic disease; Iran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Current management of gestational

trophoblastic diseases. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:654‑62.

Alazzam M, Young T, Coleman R, Hancock B, Drew D, Wilson P,

et al. Predicting gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): Is

urine hCG the answer? Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:595‑9.

Almasi A, Almassinokiani F, Akbari P. Frequency of molar

pregnancies in health care centers of Tehran, Iran. J Reprod

Infertil 2014;15:157‑60.

Lurain JR. Gestational trophoblastic disease II: Classification and

management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Am J Obstet

Gynecol 2011;204:11‑8.

Mulisya O, Roberts DJ, Sengupta ES, Agaba E, Laffita D,

Tobias T, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with

hydatidiform mole among patients undergoing uterine evacuation

at mbarara regional referral hospital. Obstet Gynecol Int

;2018:9561413.

Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM. Prediction of persistent

gestational trophobalstic neoplasia: The role of hCG level and

ratio in 2 weeks after evacuation of complete mole. Gynecol

Oncol 2012;124:250‑3.

Wolfberg AJ, Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP, Feltmate C,

Lieberman E. Postevacuation hCG levels and risk of gestational

trophoblastic neoplasia in women with complete molar

pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:548‑52.

Kim BW, Cho H, Kim H, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim S, et al.

Human chorionic gonadotrophin regression rate as a predictive

factor of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasm in

high‑risk hydatidiform mole: A case‑control study. Eur J Obstet

Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;160:100‑5.

Aminimoghaddam S, Yarandi F, Nejadsalami F, Taftachi F,

Noor Bakhsh F, Mahmoudzadeh F. Human chorionic

gonadotrophin as an indicator of persistent ges‑tational

trophoblastic neoplasia. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2014;28:44-7.

Betz, D, Fane K. Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). p. 1-328.

Thomas CMG, Kerkmeijer LGW, Ariaens HJW,

van der Steen RCBM, Massuger LFAG, Sweep FCGJ.

Pre‑evacuation hCG glycoforms in uneventful complete

hydatidiform mole and persistent trophoblastic disease. Gynecol

Oncol 2010;117:47‑52.

Shigematsu T, Kamura T, Saito T, Kaku T, Nakano H,

Kinugawa N. Identification of persistent trophoblastic diseases

based on a human chorionic gonadotropin regression curve by

means of a stepwise piecewise linear regression analysis after the

evacuation of uneventful moles. Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:376‑80.

Khosravirad A, Zayeri F, Baghestani AR, Yoosefi M,

Bakhtiyari M. Predictive power of human chorionic gonadotropin

in post‑molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A longitudinal

roc analysis. Int J Cancer Manag 2017;10:15-20.

Dantas PRS, Maestá I, Filho JR, Junior JA, Elias KM,

Howoritz N, et al. Does hormonal contraception during

molar pregnancy follow‑up influence the risk and clinical

aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after

controlling for risk factors? Gynecol Oncol 2017;147:364‑70.

Cole LA. Immunoassay of human chorionic gonadotropin, its

free subunits, and metabolites. Clin Chem 1997;43:2233‑43.

Ware JH. Random‑effects models for longitudinal data.

Biometrics 1982;38:963‑74.

Fox J. An R companion to applied regression. 3rd ed. 2018.

Rizopoulos D. Joint Models for Longitudinal and Time-to-Event

Data: With Applications in R.1st Edition. London: CRC Press,

Taylor and Francis; 2012. p.1-275.

Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Linde A van der.

Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. R Stat Soc

;64:583‑639.

Khoo SK, Baartz D, Sidhu M, Yip WL, Tripcony L. Analysis of

risk factors for persistent gestational trophoblastic disease. Aust

New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:657‑9.

Kimiaee P, Ashrafi‑Vand S, Mansournia MA, Bakhtiyari M,

Mirzamoradi M, Bakhtiyari Z. Predictive values of different

forms of human chorionic gonadotropin in postmolar gestational

trophoblastic neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24:1715‑22.

Mousavi AS, Karimi S, Modarres Gilani M, Akhavan S,

Rezayof E. Does Postevacuation β‑Human chorionic

gonadotropin level predict the persistent gestational trophoblastic

neoplasia? ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014;2014:1‑4.

Lybol C, Sweep FCGJ, Ottevanger PB, Massuger LFAG,

Thomas CMG. Linear regression of postevacuation serum

human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations predicts postmolar

gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer

;23:1150‑6.

Korevaar TIM, Steegers EAP, de Rijke YB,

Schalekamp‑Timmermans S, Visser WE, Hofman A, et al. Reference

ranges and determinants of total hCG levels during pregnancy: The

Generation R Study. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30:1057‑66.

Jagtap SV, Aher V, Gadhiya S, Jagtap SS. Gestational

trophoblastic disease‑Clinicopathological study at tertiary care

hospital. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2017;11:EC27‑30.

Ibrahim JG, Chu H, Chen LM. Basic concepts and methods

for joint models of longitudinal and survival data. J Clin Oncol

;28:2796‑801.

Quigley J, Bedford T, Walls L. Estimating rate of occurrence of

rare events with empirical bayes: A railway application.

Bakhtiyari M, Mirzamoradi M, Kimyaiee P, Aghaie A,

Mansournia MA, Ashrafi‑vand S, et al. Postmolar gestational

trophoblastic neoplasia: Beyond the traditional risk factors. Fertil

Steril 2015;104:649‑54.

Imtiaz S. Hyperreactio luteinalis with partial molar pregnancy.

Appl Radiol 2017;45‑7.

Conservative management of theca lutein cyst accident: A case

report. Int J Med Res Heal Sci 2017;6:163‑6.

Steigrad SJ. Epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic diseases.

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003;17:837‑47.

Braga A, Mora P, Melo AC de, Nogueira‑Rodrigues A,

Amim‑Junior J, Rezende‑Filho J, et al. Challenges in the

diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

worldwide. World J Clin Oncol 2019;10:28‑37.

Ngan HYS, Seckl MJ, Berkowitz RS, Xiang Y, Golfier F,

Sekharan PK, et al. Update on the diagnosis and management

of gestational trophoblastic disease. Int J Gynecol Obstet

;143:79‑85.

Biscaro A, Braga A, Berkowitz RS. Diagnosis, classification

and treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Rev Bras

Ginecol Obstet 2015;37:42‑51.

Berek JS. Novak Gynecology. 14th ed. Philadelphia, PA:

Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2007.

Zhao P, Shuangyan W, Xiuli Z, Lu W. A novel prediction model

for postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and comparison

with existing models. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017;27:1028‑34.