Challenges of Implementing Telemedicine Technology: A systematized Review

Marziye Hadian, Zahra Khakdel Jelodar, Mohammadreza Jabbari Khanbebin, Pezhman Atafimanesh, Ali Sarabi Asiabar, Seyed Mehdi Hejazi Dehagani

Abstract


Background: Today, the technologies in the world are rapidly evolving, and global infrastructure of information is spreading rapidly. The health system of different countries is facing a variety of challenges in order to apply telemedicine services. The aim of this study was to determine the challenges facing the health system of different countries in the application of telemedicine. Method: The present research was conducted in 2022 as a systematized review of studies related to challenges of telemedicine. In this study, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) guidelines were used to assess the articles. The keywords “telemedicine,” “telehealth,” “E‑health,” and “tele care” were used in combination with the Boolean operators OR and AND. The ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Ovid, Pro Quest, Wiley, and Google Scholar were searched. Results: In this study, based on the search strategy, databases were searched from January 2012 to January 2022, and in the final stage, analysis was performed on 27 selected identified articles. The use of telemedicine technology faced major formality and legality, required bandwidth, development of multilingual systems, economic efficiency, available patterns, payment for services, moral barriers, social status, differences and national and legal contradictions in the world, lack of insurance coverage challenges, and so on. Recognizing gaps and challenges can provide a way to fill these gaps and create opportunities for improvement. Conclusions: Utilizing telemedicine technology can be considered as an effective step in the health system. This technology has weaknesses that may challenge it. Successful application of telemedicine technology cannot be very effective without removing these barriers.

 

International Journal of Preventive Medicine 15():8, February 2024. | DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_48_23

Corresponding Author: Seyed Mehdi Hejazi Dehaghani

E‑mail:hejazi@mng.mui.ac.ir

You can also search for this author in: PubMed Google Scholar


Keywords


E‑Health; health systems; tele care; telemedicine; telehealth

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Qirim N. Championing telemedicine adoption and utilization in healthcare organizations in New Zealand. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:42 54.

Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:736 71.

Bhatta R, Aryal K, Ellingsen G. Opportunities and challenges of a rural telemedicine program in Nepal. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2015;13:149 53.

Alizadeh A, Mohammadi A, Khademloo M, Hosaini H. Survey of views of medical students on telemedicine methods developed in the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Strides Dev Med Educ 2013;10:247 59. [In Persian].

Stanberry B. Legal ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2001;64:225 33.

Senapati S, Advincula AP. Telemedicine and robotics: Paving the way to the globalization of surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;91:210 6.

Shafiei Nikabadi M, Safavi Jahromi G. Identifying and analyzing the barriers of telemedicine implementation in Iran. Health Inf Manage 2015;12:297 305. [In Persian].

Wang TT, Li JM, Zhu CR, Hong Z, An DM, Yang HY, et al. Assessment of utilization and cost effectiveness of telemedicine program in western regions of China: A 12 year study of 249 hospitals across 112 cities. Telemed J E Health 2016;22:909 20.

Kahn EN, La Marca F, Mazzola CA. Neurosurgery and telemedicine in the United States: Assessment of the risks and opportunities. World Neurosurg 2016;89:133 8.

Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J 2009;26:91 108.

CASP U. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklists. 2017 .

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:777 84.

Takahashi T. The present and future of telemedicine. Int J Med Inform 2001;61:131 7.

Keshvari H, Haddadpoor A, Taheri B, Nasri M. Determining the awareness and attitude of employees in deputy of health of Isfahan University of Medical Science toward telemedicine and its advantages. Acta Inform Med 2015;23:97 101.

Cho S, Mathiassen L, Gallivan M. Crossing the diffusion chasm: From invention to penetration of a telehealth innovation. Inf Technol People 2009;22:351 66.

Kesavadev J, Saboo B, Shankar A, Krishnan G, Jothydev S. Telemedicine for diabetes care: An Indian perspective feasibility and efficacy. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2015;19:764 9.

Lindeman D. Interview: Lessons from a leader in telehealth diffusion: A conversation with Adam Darkins of the veterans health administration. Ageing International 2011;36:146 54.

Nematollahi M, Abhari S. Assessing the information and communication technology infrastructures of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in order to implement the telemedicine system in 2013. Interdiscip J Virtual Learning Med Sci 2014;5:44 51. [In Persian].

Sherwood BG, Han Y, Nepple KG, Erickson BA. Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency and safety of telemedicine for urological care in the male prisoner population. Urol Pract 2018;5:44 51.

Kaplan B, Litewka S. Ethical challenges of telemedicine and telehealth. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2008;17:401 16.

Mehdizadeh H, Esmaeili N. The use of telemedicine in the diagnosis of skin diseases: Review of clinical outcomes. J Health Biomed Inform 2014;1:63 73.

Burdick AE, Mahmud K, Jenkins DP. Telemedicine: Caring for patients across boundaries. Ostomy Wound Manage 1996;42:26 4, 36.

Bashshur RL, Reardon TG, Shannon GW. Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system. Annu Rev Public Health 2000;21:613 37.

Mars M, Scott RE. Global e health policy: A work in progress. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:237 43.

Shaarbafchizadeh N, Azami S, Bastani P. Opportunities and challenges against cross border supply of health services in Iranian health sector: A qualitative approach. Razi J Med Sci 2012;19:1 11. [In Persian].

Whitten PS, Mackert MS. Addressing telehealth’s foremost barrier: Provider as initial gatekeeper. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:517 21.

Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA, Erps KA, Holcomb M, Barker GP, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: Opportunities and barriers. Am J Med 2014;127:183 7.

Doshmangir L, Esmaeilzadeh H, Arab Zozani M. Assessing the strategic position of telemedicine technology in Iran. J Manag Med Inf School 2014;2:144 51. [In Persian].

Rajabi F, Esmailzadeh H, Rostamigooran N, Majdzadeh R, Doshmangir L. Future of health care delivery in Iran, opportunities and threats. Iran J Public Health 2013;42(Suppl 1):23 30.

Esmailzadeh H, Doshmangir L, Tafazoli M. Key factors influencing the use of telemedicine technology in Iran: Experts viewpoints . Teb va Tazkiyeh 2013;22:51 8. [In Persian].

Stanberry B. Telemedicine: Barriers and opportunities in the 21st century. J Intern Med 2000;247:615 28.

Martinez Alvarez M, Chanda R, Smith RD. How is telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India. Global Health 2011;7:17.

Ala’Eddin MA, AlSuhaibany SA, Alsharqi OZ, Al Borie HM, Qattan AM. Telemedicine application and difficulties among Prince Sultan Medical City in Saudi Arabia. Am Acad Schol Res J 2013;5:24.

Salehahmadi Z, Hajialiasghari F. Telemedicine in Iran: Chances and challenges. World J Plast Surg 2013;2:18 25.