<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName></PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>International Journal of Preventive Medicine</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2008-7802</Issn>
<Volume>3</Volume>
<Issue>2</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Smoking Paradox at Cardiac Rehabilitation</ArticleTitle>
<FirstPage>463</FirstPage>
<LastPage>463</LastPage>
<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>Allahyar</FirstName>
<LastName>Golabchi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Cardiologist, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.. golabchi@edc.mui.ac.ir</Affiliation>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<History>
<PubDate>
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubDate>
</History>
<Abstract>Recently, I have read with interest the article byMosayebi et al.[1] entitled &ldquo;The Effects of CardiacTertiary Prevention Program after CoronaryArtery Bypass Graft Surgery on Health andQuality of Life&rdquo; in your esteemed journal. Thecardiac rehabilitation (CR) program significantlyimproves the functional capacity in postmyocardialinfarction patients, especially those revascularizedby coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).[2]I would like to attract the authors&rsquo; and readers&rsquo;attention to some points that can be helpful inhaving high quality research.</Abstract>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>